You’ve got to hear this . . .

Written by Eric Berna on November 3rd, 2007

I recently found this great song. Part of the song is a computer simulation voice (the same voice Stephen Hawking uses), reciting a poem. It starts with the “Footprints in the Sand” poem, and adds a great ending, expressing what has always bothered me about that poem.

The song is called The God Who Wasn’t There. by DJ Madson. Check it out. There used to be a free MP3 download, but that link was taken down. So you can find in on iTunes.


Sounds Good to Me

Written by Eric Berna on February 17th, 2007

We have a bunch of TVs hanging from the ceiling in front of the exercise machines at our Y. I was on an elliptical machine this morning, and watching the history channel. Glancing around at the other TVs during a commercial, I noticed a headline on the FOX news channel about Anna Nicole Smith’s estate. Apparently her will wasn’t in order, and the IRS will get most of her fortune in inheritance taxes.

In another showing of their distain for middle class America, FOX called this a debacle, as if this windfall for the IRS was a bad thing.

Anna Nicole Smith’s estate going to the IRS sounds good to me, because that is a small dent in the national debt. Now, my children’s tax obligation will be just a little bit smaller. It’s also better for society. Anna Nicole’s child, who should get what’s remaining, will still get enough to be comfortable her whole life. Without the obscene fortune, this child has a chance to be forgotten by the media, and live her own life.

Also, the money will benefit the economy far better if spent by the US government than if hoarded by Anna Nicole’s estate. The money will move through the economy, paying salaries, buying supplies, paying benefits, or paying down the debt. The recipients of the money will then further move the money, fueling the economy. The money will move now, instead of sitting in trust funds waiting for the child to reach age.


The Price of Gas

Written by Eric Berna on May 8th, 2006

The price of gasoline is based on the price of a barrel of oil, or at least that’s what the oil companies tell us. Some simple calculations show that today’s high gas prices aren’t strictly based on the price of crude oil.

A 35 gallon barrel of oil produces 19.5 gallons of gas, the rest goes into other petroleum based products. Gasoline doesn’t carry the majority of the value of the oil, since diesel and heating oil cost about the same as gasoline. Therefore the raw materials cost for a gallon of gasoline is at most 3% of the cost of a barrel of oil.

Back in 1996 the price of a gallon of gas was about $1.20, and the price of a barrel of oil was about $20. Back then, $0.60 of the price of a gallon of gas was the raw material cost, the other $0.60 went to everything else (taxes, transportation, refining, marketing, etc.). Now it’s $2.90 a gallon of gas and $65 a barrel of oil. That works out to $1.95 for raw materials and $0.95 for everything else.

Even at the exaggerated rate of 3% a year, inflation would raise the price for everything else to $0.81. Over these ten years, due to improvements in such things as refining technology and distribution logistics, and the fact that inflation was nowhere near 3% a year, the “everything else” should stay steady or even decrease.

Therefore the oil companies are using the high cost of a barrel of oil as an hollow excuse. Crude oil is high, and that should make gasoline prices high. Yet these simple calculations, and the record profits of the oil companies show that they are gouging you and me.


Sudden Popularity and Ransomware

Written by Eric Berna on January 28th, 2006

Most books meet their publisher’s initial expectations of popularity. A-list authors such as Stephen King, Danielle Steel, and Tom Clancy consistently produce popular books. Second tier authors that have built a following produce books with steadily increasing popularity. Most of the rest of the books come and go in relative obscurity. And rarely a book will garner much greater popularity than initially expected.

These rare breakout books happen for various reasons. Maybe the book’s topic is important or controversial, maybe a talk show host recommends the book, or maybe the book is just that good.

In traditional publishing, royalty payment systems automatically adjust the earnings of an author to the popularity of a book. These breakout books result in a great windfall for the author.

Ransomware, unlike traditional publishing, doesn’t include a mechanism to adjust the author’s earnings to the popularity of the book. This lack doesn’t pose a problem with the A-list authors, who know that their books will be worth large sums of money. They just set the ransom price appropriately, and they will earn about what they would earn in traditional publishing. And ransomware publishing isn’t a problem for the majority of authors who make a small amount from their work, and honestly set their expectations at the same level.

Where ransomware does pose a problem is with the few breakout books. If an author publishes a book through ransomware and Oprah selects the book for her book club, the author could loose out on a small fortune. He could have made millions, but he only gets the originally set ransomware price.

Or does he?

First off, just because a book has earned its ransom and is fully released doesn’t mean the collection system needs to close. With a popular book there will continue to be a small percentage of readers who will want to financially reward the author for his work.

Second, even though a book is published as an e-book, the book can be sold in other formats. Many readers still prefer to read a book made of paper. The publisher can produce the book as a print on demand, or even a high volume print run. Some authors are staking their career on the fact that some readers will want to buy a paper book even though the book is released as a freely available e-book (e.g. Cory Doctorow, A more popular ransomware book results in more paper copies sold which results in more money for the author.

Third, a popular book can make far more from derivative works than the original book earned. Ransomware in no way requires the author give up any derivative rights in the work. For example money seems to flow much easier in the movie business. I’ve seen reports of authors earning much more from selling movie rights than they earned from the direct sales of the book. Another derivative avenue is producing the sequel. The next story can be sold for a much higher ransom.

Lastly, for the author that wishes to make a life long career out of producing ransomware books, a phenomenally popular book can be considered just a step along that career path. This one breakout book will garner the writer an almost automatic audience for his following works. The ransom price for the next book can be set much higher. Building a career on ransomware publishing is worthy of much more discussion, so I’ll cover this in more depth in additional posts.


What is Ransomware?

Written by Eric Berna on January 25th, 2006

Some years ago, as I recall, Stephen King published an e-book through his Web site. At the time, the prevailing thought on how to make any money at selling e-books, or any digital content, was locking up the files in some sort of digital rights management. Each buyer of content would get a unique file that they alone could read.  Yet, nobody had figured out an unbreakable system, so no major writer was willing to publish e-books.

Mr. King decided to try an experimental new way of selling an e-book. He posted one chapter at a time to his Web site. He requested that each individual pay $1 for each chapter downloaded. As long as a certain percentage of downloaders paid for chapters he would continue to publish chapters. This was his attempt to insure he was paid based on the popularity of the book.  He even insited that each individual pay that $1.  He didn’t want his most interested and financially secure readers to make up the difference for the readers who didn’t pay, even though he had some readers willing to pay $10, $100, or even $1,000 per chapter to make up for 9, 99, or even 999 other readers.

Unfortunately his publishing attempt failed. Not enough downloaders paid for the chapters. Mr. King expressed frustration with the way the experiment worked out, and he ended up not finishing the book.

At the time I thought he was being silly, expecting most of the book’s readers to pay one dollar a chapter for the book. I thought this was especially silly since he didn’t get paid in the same manner for his other books.

The way Mr. King and most writers get paid for writing a book published the traditional way is through an advance negotiated with the publishers.  An advance is sort of a loan from the publisher that is paid back from the royalties (per book earnings) the author’s book makes.  The author gets the advance by the time the book is for sale in book stores.  The author doesn’t have to pay back the advance, if the book doesn’t sell enough copies. Yet he dosen’t get to keep any additional royalties until the advance is paid back.  If the book is popular enough, the author can make a great deal more than that initial advance. Of course this is a simplification, and there are all sorts of wrinkles on this system in the real world.

Mr. King’s advances were in the millions of dollars per book, so he probably rarely paid back his advances, and earned additional per book royalties.  His earnings per book were based on what he (or his agent) could convince his publisher the book was worth.  Using the popularity of major writers such as Mr. King, a publisher can earn additional money from the other books they publish. So a book by Mr. King may directly earn less than the advance paid to Mr. King, yet still result in a bottom line profit for the publisher.

So he was selling his books to the publisher based on an up front price that wasn’t necessarily based on the books’ true popularity. At the time of this experiment I thought that Mr. King should do the same for his e-book. He should sell the book based on an up front price, and not try to worry about having his earnings match his popularity.

The system would work like this: Once an author has written a book, he would decide what the book was worth for him to publish it. The book must be split into a certain number of chapters, and he would publish the first chapter. He’d divide the sale price of the book by the number of chapters (minus the one free chapter), and ask for that amount before he published his next chapter. He would suggest a price per person per chapter, but not require it. Those readers who found real value in the work could pay what they want, and those readers who couldn’t or wouldn’t pay for whatever reason could still read the work and hope enough other readers would pay for the release of the next chapter.

For example, imagine a famous author who thinks his latest book was worth $1,000,000, and is willing to publish using this system. Imagine the book is eleven chapters. Since the first chapter is free, he divides his desired earnings by ten chapters, and comes up with a price of $100,000 per chapter. He suggests $1 per chapter price, but accepts any amount. If he gets a million readers, and 10% of them pay for the chapters, he’s made the desired amount.

I call this system of publishing ransomware. The publisher of the material is holding the later chapters hostage and will release the material when the ransom is paid.

In other posts I’ll elaborate on aspects of this system, such as some of the realities of collecting small payments, and how this system would encourage readers to promote the work.


First post

Written by Eric Berna on January 8th, 2006


This is my first post, and I don’t have anything to say. Yet . . .